Once they have achieved the good 'prick job' and the reproductive drive is satisfied with casual sex they seem to have settled for delegating the breeding to others less successful and therefore less able to provide the necessities for the next generation of leaders in any occupations let alone the 'prick jobs.' While I do not object to any human breeding, the cream will rise from any population; I still want to scream at a well bonded couple with a successful female partner "Knock her up, humanity needs her genes." As Heinlein noted, "Nobody owns his genes, he is merely their custodian." Successful homosexual bonded couples solve the problem by having or adopting children. I have heard of one lesbian couple who worked out an arrangement with a gay couple to have children naturally with both two dads and two moms. Similar to a shared custody agreement, although at the time impossible to formalize.
One of the issues feminists' apparently still have with Heinlein is that all of his intelligent, strong, competent, successful women were breeders. They actively searched out intelligent, strong, competent, successful men and got pregnant as soon as possible. Even most of the juveniles had strong female characters that were scheming to be breeders. One would think feminists would celebrate conservation of the genes of such women, but it seems not to be the case either in fiction or in real life.